User Provisioned Infrastructure & Installer Provisioned Infrastructure Differences:

Download all the OpenShift Free PDF Learning materials.

User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) and Installer Provisioned Infrastructure (IPI) are two deployment models available for OpenShift v4, each with distinct characteristics. Here are the top 15 differences between them:

1. Infrastructure Provisioning:
   • UPI: The user is responsible for manually creating and managing all infrastructure components, including compute, storage, and networking resources.
   • IPI: The OpenShift installer automates the provisioning of infrastructure components, simplifying the setup process.
2. Control and Customization:
   • UPI: Offers more control and customization options for the underlying infrastructure.
   • IPI: Provides a more standardized and less customizable setup.
3. Complexity:
   • UPI: Generally more complex due to manual steps required in setting up infrastructure.
   • IPI: Simplifies deployment by automating many steps, reducing complexity.
4. Installation Time:
   • UPI: Installation time can be longer due to manual processes.
   • IPI: Typically faster to deploy due to automation.
5. Cloud Provider Dependencies:
   • UPI: Can be deployed on a wider range of environments, including non-cloud environments.
   • IPI: Mainly focused on major cloud providers and may have limitations in non-cloud or smaller cloud environments.
6. Network Configuration:
   • UPI: Offers more flexibility in network configuration and integration with existing network setups.
   • IPI: Uses a more standardized network configuration which may not fit all scenarios.
7. Storage Configuration:
   • UPI: Allows for more complex and customized storage setups.
   • IPI: Comes with pre-configured storage options, with less room for customization.
8. Maintenance and Upgrades:
   • UPI: Requires more manual intervention for maintenance and upgrades.
   • IPI: Simplifies maintenance and upgrades through automation.
9. Scalability:
   • UPI: Scaling the infrastructure requires manual intervention.
   • IPI: Offers easier scaling options through the platform’s automated capabilities.
10. Support and Troubleshooting:
    • UPI: Might require more in-depth knowledge for troubleshooting due to the custom nature of the setup.
    • IPI: Easier to support and troubleshoot due to standardized configurations.
11. Integration with Existing Systems:
    • UPI: Better suited for integration with existing systems and complex enterprise environments.
    • IPI: May have limitations in integrating with certain existing systems.
12. Load Balancing:
    • UPI: Allows for custom load balancing solutions.
    • IPI: Comes with pre-configured load balancing options.
13. Security Configuration:
    • UPI: Provides more control over security configurations.
    • IPI: Security settings are largely pre-configured, with some options for customization.
14. Resource Optimization:
    • UPI: Allows for more detailed resource optimization and tuning.
    • IPI: Focuses on a balanced resource setup, which may not be optimized for all use cases.
15. Initial Cost and Effort:
    • UPI: Potentially higher initial cost and effort due to manual setup and configuration.
    • IPI: Lower initial effort and cost due to automation, but might have less flexibility in cost optimization.

These differences highlight that UPI is better suited for environments requiring high levels of customization and integration, while IPI is ideal for users seeking a simplified, automated deployment process with less need for detailed control over the infrastructure.